Seduction by Design

Bethany Hensel, who is among many other things the senior writer of Lux Magazine (and she adores Joshua Bell, who I have to admit is pretty adorable!), just announced that she’s going to be doing a very cool series called “Seduction by Design.”  It’s going to feature essays, interviews, and reader questions.  For some bizarre reason, the focus of this series is . . . me.  And it will have a new entry on the tenth of every month.

I have to admit that this makes me just a leetle bit nervous.  A new series?  Entries every month?  I can imagine material to fill one . . . maybe two months, and one is not really a series.  That kind of volume makes me think of Robert Caro’s incredible biographies–where in the beginning, the Johnson family (for his LBJ series) or Robert Moses (for the Power Broker) granted him interviews . . . up until the point when they discovered that Robert Caro was going to turn his unflinching eye to the very bad as well as the good.  So I can’t help but wonder whether Bethany will uncover my deep, dark secrets.

I swear, Bethany–I didn’t kill him!  He was dead before I got there!

How Long is too Long?

So, here’s a moral dilemma.  I mean, it’s not a dilemma.  It is more like a little bit of moral tension.

I have some very strong views on copyright.  Or, to put it differently:  I have very strong views on the strength of copyright.  I think, among other things, that the term of copyright granted in our society is way too long.  I think, among other things, that fan fiction should be unambiguously allowed.  If I had my way, I’d set the term of copyright to the term of patents, or at most twice that:  twenty to forty years, max.  Possibly twenty years with an additional twenty year automatic extension, which must be applied for with a tiny (say $10) processing fee.

That is never, ever going to happen, so I think that the second-best thing is to contract around onerous copyright rules, e.g., through a Creative Commons license.

But I did just happen to sign a contract that gives HQN the rights to my copyright so long as my book remains in print, for the natural length of copyright.  I feel . . . very ambiguous about this.  I feel that it would be wrong–really wrong, and because I feel so strongly about copyright length, for me, downright morally hazardous–if one of my descendants were still making royalties off my book in a century.  And however much I still want my book to be on sale then (I know, dream on), it bothers me.

Ultimately, I had no problem signing the contract simply because I don’t think my book will be in print in 100 years, and my rights will revert to me, and I’ll probably release it into the public domain long before then, either by bequest or during my life–because once my book has lived out its time of commercial viability, I feel I have an obligation to release it into the public domain, even if technically the copyright has many decades to go.

What do you think of all this?  If you’re an author, do you feel like you have any interest at all in what happens to your books 100 years from now?  Does it bother you to think you can hold on to a piece of culture for a full century?

Open Letter to Borders

Dear Borders, I’m really rooting for you to stay in business.  I love browsing your shelves, and although there are a number of independent bookstores near where I live, none of them carry romance.  I’ve spent a ton of money on books in the last five years.  And I know that some Borders stores are better than others–perhaps I’ve been spoiled since the Borders I knew and best loved was in Ann Arbor, and you don’t get much better than Borders #1.

But the store near my house right now radically sucks.  It seems to me that if you want to stay in business, you have to sell books, and in order to do that, you have to have books and make them easy to buy.  If I walk into a store looking for Madeline Hunter’s The Sins of Lord Easterbrook, or Connie Brockway’s So Enchanting, I want to buy them.  I do not want to go over to the new paperback release table and find that all of the books on the table are Christmas books that came out in October.  That is ridiculous.  I do not want to head back to the romance section, only to find that the only Connie Brockway book you have is Skinny Dipping, and you have 10 copies of Lessons of Desire but not a single copy of The Sins of Lord Easterbrook.  If I’m looking for a copy of Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet, I want to find it out in the new fiction hardback section–you might consider moving your copies of Santa Clawed from the front of the store, now that it’s February–and not secreted way back in the wrong section, filed in non-alphabetical order.

Someone should make sure that if Inkheart comes out as a movie, copies appear on the shelves.  One shouldn’t find a bookshelf entirely devoid in the Funke department.  And when I ask where Inkheart is–hoping, madly, that you’ve set up a special display somewhere because it is a movie–the employee should not tell me that you are out, and that over the last two weeks (!!) they’ve had twenty people ask for the book.  How can you get twenty requests for a book and yet not make an effort to stock it?

And–oh pain, pain, pain–why oh why are you not carrying Bujold’s latest?  Are you mad?  It’s Bujold that will bring me into a bookstore on the release date, and I never walk out with just one book.

Local Borders, you were not always this bad.  Even a year ago, you had books I wanted to buy on the shelf when I wanted to buy them.  I spend a lot of money on books–close to $100 a month–and you are the reason why I am slowly moving entirely to purchases made from my Kindle.  I hate to do it.  I love books.  I love browsing books.  I love going to a random section of the store and picking something totally off the wall, and you can’t just browse with a Kindle, not the same way you can in a bookstore.

Borders, I feel like you are the friend that I want to see succeed–but I can’t do anything for you if you just sit in your mother’s basement and mope and play sad, solitary chords on your guitar.  So get off your ass and start selling books.

Love,

Courtney

What do we think?

So this last month has been a bit of an experiment for me.  My goal–which was met–was to post every business day of the month, to see if it was a good idea.

How was I to judge if it was a good idea?  Uh….

Well, I had no real criteria, which might be a problem.  The problem is this:  I don’t see the point of a blog if it’s not posted on regularly, e.g., at least every few days.  I also don’t see the point of a blog if it is boring, and if I had to post a lot, I would be boring.

I think I have decided that posting every day qualifies as “boring.”  And yet nothing is more boring than a blog without posts.  Plus, blogging requires a certain mindset, so if you’re not in it–if you don’t have your antenna up in search of blog posts–you’re guaranteed to post irregularly, and you’ll be boring to boot.

So what do we think?  More blogging?  Less blogging?  Boring blogging?  Non-boring blogging?

Pictures

So I’m getting my official photo taken today.  I really hate getting my picture taken.  Part of the problem is that when I was much, much younger, my older brother told me that when your picture gets taken, a little bit of your soul got sucked out–and as proof, submitted that models were always airheads.  (I don’t know why soulless was so easily translated into brainless.)  In any event, I never believed him.  But since my older brother was basically in charge of the family (Courtney mentions oh so casually), I had no choice but to obey his wishes, which meant that every time Dad took out his camera, we had to scream and run away and hide, or make faces so ridiculously contorted that Dad would give up on getting a decent photo.

The problem is that habit persists today, even when I wish I wouldn’t.  Well, not the screaming and running away part–today, I am paying someone actual money to take pictures of me.  No; the part that’s still there is the making faces bit.  I don’t know why it is, but I always manage to have the dumbest look on my face when people take pictures of me.

The worst part is when people try to reassure me.  “What are you talking about?” they ask.  “You look perfectly normal in that picture.”

AAAHHHHHHH!!!!!  I look like that all the time?!

Happy February!

A few things to notice about this beautiful February day which is not quite the first of February.

First, as I mentioned when I talked about my website update, courtneymilan.com has changed its feathers from light blue to . . . oh, well, it turns out I am writing this blog post slightly before February, and so I don’t remember what pastel color February has adopted.  Maybe it is light pink?  Light brown?  Light yellow?  Light green?  There is only one way for you to find out, and that is to go visit my website.  Hurry, hurry!

BUT STOP!  Don’t hurry too quickly, because February is an exciting month for another reason entirely.  I have tentative release dates, and PROOF BY SEDUCTION is slated for release on February 1, 2010.  Yay!

I know, I know.  My hordes of shrieking fans (yes, yes, both of you–by the way, thanks for the support, Mom) are wondering how you can possibly wait a whole entire year before they rush off to purchase stacks and stacks of Courtney Milan books.  I know.  A year is an impossibly long time, and one cannot possibly go a whole year without making a purchase of a book by Courtney Milan.  (Although I must point out, it is a year minus one day, so not precisely a whole year.)

So for those of you who are shrieking in horror at the thought of an entire year without Courtney Milan, rest assured–you will not have to wait a full 12 months to plunk down your hard-earned cash.  You will only have to wait eight months, which is much, much better than a year.  How much better?  Four months better, that’s how much!  On October 1, 2009, you will be able to buy your first Courtney Milan novella, entitled “This Wicked Gift,” which will be available in a lovely anthology entitled THE HEART OF CHRISTMAS (also featuring novellas from Mary Balogh and Nicola Cornick).

Oh, yes.  You read that right.  It’s a Christmas story that’s hitting the stores before Hallowe’en, in complete violation of the no-longer-holy Hallowe’en-Christmas marketing barrier, which itself was a complete violation of the once-sacrosanct Thanksgiving-Christmas marketing barrier.  And that means I’m going to be promoting my Christmas-themed novella before October–think August and September.  Ha ha ha!  There will be no fiddly little Christmas creep at courtneymilan.com.  Instead, Christmas is growing pseudopods and engulfing you in all its holly-decorated glory.

You will celebrate Christmas.  You will celebrate Christmas NOW.

P.S.  If you are not Christian, you may substitute a winter holiday of your choice, although you must celebrate said holiday NOW.  Here at courtneymilan.com, our pseudopods are equal opportunity engulfers!

Out of Order

Writers know that there are two kinds of writers.  People who plot.  And people who make the plot up on the seat of their pants.  I’m some kind of Frankenstein amalgam of the two; I like to say I plot by writing.  The truth of the matter is, I usually have a pretty good idea of the larger events in my book when I start writing: the black moment, the mid-book crisis, and maybe a few intervening events.  But the small stuff, the engine that drives the book from point A to point B, is usually made up on the fly.  In fact, it’s so made up on the fly that I usually make it up after I need it, and that is because I write with absolutely no semblance of order.

I’m at the frightening place in my manuscript where I have a good smattering of scenes written, but no more than a few thousand contiguous words…. anywhere.  My manuscript is like a pile of confetti, with random pieces from beginning, middle, and end all piled together.  I jump ahead to scenes I know are coming, rather than beat my head against scenes I’m not sure about, and then jump back to fill in blanks.  That means that there’s some point–erm, that would be now–when I don’t really have a work in progress so much as a series of disconnected flashes, punctuated mostly by question marks.

Filling in those question marks is actually the most fun.  For instance, last week I figured out how the hero is going to solve a problem that crops up near the end of the book.  I wrote that scene, and realized that in order for the solution to be effective, the hero was going to have to rely on the availability of, some item.  Let us call it Dingbat A.  Now, you never want to have your hero reach into his bag of tools at the crucial moment and say, “Aha!  Dingbat A!”  Not unless you want your readers to complain that Dingbat A comes out of nowhere and is a complete deus ex machina.  You cannot do this unless you are writing episodes of Inspector Gadget.  So that means that I had to have a scene earlier on where Dingbat A is introduced.

Of course, you also never want to have an earlier scene where you say, “Oh, Dingbat A.  How I love thee.  I foresee that you might be useful, in the event I am set upon by ravening were-hedgehogs.” Because then your reader will get to the were hedgehogs and say, “Oh, for crying out loud, just use Dingbat A already.”  Ideally, you want to introduce your reader to the solution to Big Problem sideways–that is, you want to make Dingbat A present, or even better, problematic, rather than showing it as a potential solution.  (A side benefit:  This makes your characters appear smarter than they are.  Nobody needs to know you thought of the solution first and then figured out how to hide it in plain sight.)

I realize that all this sounds horribly circuitous.  Welcome to writing a book with Courtney.

In any event, I had this great idea for a scene that introduced Dingbat A.  It was sexy.  It wasn’t about Dingbat A, although you can see Dingbat A in use–and that’s always a good thing, because that means it’s a scene that’s a nice piece of misdirection.  Plus, it was funny, which is always a bonus.  It made me realize why I write my books out of order.  Because, you see, the scene starts at the point when my hero and heroine have Colonel Draven tied up on the floor and covered with petticoats.

You probably don’t think there’s anything odd about that (or at least anything odder than what I have said so far) and I suppose there isn’t.  But what I really really want to know is–Who is Colonel Draven?  How have they tied him up?  And why the hell are they covering him with petticoats?

Thus arises the minutiae of plot.

New Agent in Town….

If you don’t get Kristin Nelson’s newsletter, you might not know that there’s a new agent in town!  Sara Megibow, who has been Kristin’s literary assistant for several years, is going to start acquiring projects.  Sara has this to say about what she’s looking for:

I love super sexy and intelligent romances. In the sf/fantasy world, I am looking for the story and characters to be as compelling as the world. In terms of YA and MG, I am excited to see more projects set in the real world (as opposed to vampires or werewolves, although, of course, those are still okay). Finally, I am itching for some fabulous historical fiction (like MISTRESS OF THE ART OF DEATH) or multicultural fiction both for younger readers and the adult market.

If Sara is half the agent Kristin is, she is going to be absolutely superb at agenting–and knowing how intelligent and competent she is, I fully expect that she’ll be every bit as good as Kristin.  I can’t wait to see the first sales on Publisher’s Marketplace with Sara’s name attached.  I’m sure it won’t be long.

Well Witched

I tend to read a wide variety of books, including fantasy and science fiction.  And that means that I have gravitated towards YA reading much, much more than I did, say, five years ago, because quite simply, some of the best fantasy out there is coming out in YA.  The label “young adult” or even “middle grade” can be confusing for people who don’t remember what they read when they were in middle grades, and were young adults.  The label doesn’t mean that the themes are dumbed down or that the books are less carefully crafted.  Often it means that the genres are harder to peg–where would you have placed Markus Zusak’s “The Book Thief” in the adult world?  Literary fiction? Historical fiction?  But then there is that paranormal element, too, since it’s narrated by death.

In short, I love young adult books to death, and I’ve read more great fantasy and science fiction in YA in recent years than I have in the regular old adult sections.

Over the weekend, on a whim I picked up a copy of Frances Hardinge’s Well Witched.  I’d read her first novel, “Fly by Night” many many years ago.  I don’t even think I bought it myself.  As I recall, it was a gift from a friend who personally the author, who also knew that I was a Harry Potter fanatic and thought I might like it.  In retrospect, now that I am an author myself, I suspect my friend hoped I would become as fanatical about Hardinge as I was about Rowling, and I’m sure that my lackluster response was probably disappointing.  I read it.  It was fun.  I thought it was a decent first try.  I didn’t love it, though–I thought the main character was a little flat and the world building a little dry–and I promptly forgot about the author.  I’m not even sure why I picked up this book (which has the much cooler title of “Verdigris Deep” in the UK but apparently that’s too inaccessible for us slobs in the US audience?), except that I was itching for a fantasy and my local Borders didn’t have “Inkheart” in stock. (A tale for another day–HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE, BORDERS?)

Several hours later, I emerged, blinking, into the light.  Well Witched is everything I love in a book.  It’s fraught with moral ambiguity.  The villains  are never identifiable.  The plot construction is tight.  There is character growth both subtle and deep.  Oh, and the main character has tiny eyes that grow on the back of his hand.

There is no romance in the book, but it has the thing I love best about romance:  A boy who learns to appreciate things he’d never seen about the people he loves, who not only grows literal eyes, but learns to see figuratively deeper.

I adore the fact that ten year olds will read this book, and I hope that adults will, too.